| 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
MyNameDidntFit Kabalite Warrior

Posts : 140 Join date : 2014-05-13
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 15:02 | |
| - @darthken239 wrote:
- i haven't got the rule book yet, waiting on the small one via E-bay. but was told that objective points are calculated at the end of each turn now. In a 5 objective game, unless we're playing an equally fast opponent we should be able to grab 10 objective points by turn 2. making it much harder for the enemy to catch up.
Is that correct about the objective points??? Cause bikes just got i little better, how cares if they can only snap fire next turn, bladevanes all the way
If you're using the new Maelstrom of War missions then you get 3 Tactical Objectives each turn that may or may not involve securing an objective--there's a D66 table. | |
|
 | |
Brom Wych

Posts : 755 Join date : 2013-03-28
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 16:10 | |
| Ive read my new books through a few times and played a few games now. The rules are basically cleaned up 6th with some needed tweaks. And a busted psyker phase.
Deployment is now better though.. Randomly determine mission. Place terrain. Place objectives (except emperors will and relic). Roll for deployment map. THEN roll table sides. Then roll for 1st deployment. The player that wins the roll chooses to deploy first or second. The player that deploys first then chooses to go first or second. Much better IMO.
| |
|
 | |
chuckcNY Slave

Posts : 9 Join date : 2012-10-01 Location : White Plains, NY
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 16:30 | |
| Are formations officially a part of 7th? i.e. if i show up at LGS or even at a tournament, and I'm playing the Carnival of Pain formation from Apoc, do I get the bonuses for that formation? | |
|
 | |
Deamon Sybarite

Posts : 265 Join date : 2012-05-09 Location : Drummondville
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 16:38 | |
| Apoc formation are still apoc only. | |
|
 | |
Heezayy Slave

Posts : 9 Join date : 2013-10-09
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 20:29 | |
| It says all vehicles now have WS 1 so does that mean we now have to roll to hit with our wyches against a Land Raider which hasn't moved? Am I right in thinking that you're just as likely to Fast-Skimmer (so hovering above the ground) which turbo-boosted (moved extremely fast) is just as easy to hit in CC than a giant, static, grounded Land Raider? Please tell me I have misread! | |
|
 | |
Deathofclubs Slave

Posts : 18 Join date : 2014-05-07
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 20:48 | |
| It's not that bad. Our Wyches actually got better. Charge a vehicle, if there are 2 close ones then disorderly charge both. Then proceed to throw 10 haywire grenades. We hit on 3+, so 2/3's of them hit. Now that leaves 6-7 hits. 5/6 of them glance which is up to 6 glances, killing one if not both vehicles. Plus now in close combat penetrating hits take away 2 hull points, making us even more brutal. We now don't have to worry about the vehicle exploding on us since we can't roll a 7+. And finally if we assault into an actual unit we can take defensive grenades that now blind. Making WS1 for the whole unit, which means we will most likely win any close combat where we hit with a defensive grenade in the shooting phase. TL;DR Wyches may be now be one of our best units. _________________ "A fall from that height would kill anyone — before they struck the ground!"
| |
|
 | |
Heezayy Slave

Posts : 9 Join date : 2013-10-09
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 20:56 | |
| Ah okay, thanks! I still find it silly that models can hit our skinny super fast vehicles just as easy as large static ones though. | |
|
 | |
Devilogical Sybarite

Posts : 453 Join date : 2013-09-25 Location : Russia!!!
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 21:25 | |
| - @Deamon wrote:
- Apoc formation are still apoc only.
So i can take Dark olympyad only as unbound army? _________________ `We faced a Dysjunction... we were betrayed, destroyed, ashamed, hunted... Now look who is been risen from the ashes...`
Succubus Ariel the Vengefull of the Wych cult Blade Denied to her sister, archon Elieae after the conquering Low Commoragh Dark spire.
| |
|
 | |
Mngwa Wych

Posts : 955 Join date : 2013-01-26 Location : Stadi
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 21:34 | |
| - @Deathofclubs wrote:
- It's not that bad. Our Wyches actually got better. Charge a vehicle, if there are 2 close ones then disorderly charge both. Then proceed to throw 10 haywire grenades. We hit on 3+, so 2/3's of them hit. Now that leaves 6-7 hits. 5/6 of them glance which is up to 6 glances, killing one if not both vehicles. Plus now in close combat penetrating hits take away 2 hull points, making us even more brutal. We now don't have to worry about the vehicle exploding on us since we can't roll a 7+. And finally if we assault into an actual unit we can take defensive grenades that now blind. Making WS1 for the whole unit, which means we will most likely win any close combat where we hit with a defensive grenade in the shooting phase.
TL;DR Wyches may be now be one of our best units. Penetrating hits dont take away 2 hullpoints, just count as 2 wounds for assault results (used when fighting walkers or chariots, I imagine) | |
|
 | |
Plastikente Sybarite

Posts : 373 Join date : 2012-11-15 Location : London
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 21:41 | |
| As much as it nerfs us, I can't help but think the thing about templates and open vehicles was coming. Where exactly would you hide from a spray of burning liquid on a flying skateboard?
It does sound like we've taking a bit of a beating, all-in-all though. I guess we can only hope that a new codex will fix some stuff, like maybe making WWPs work again... | |
|
 | |
The Shredder Trueborn

Posts : 2969 Join date : 2013-04-11
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 22:03 | |
| - @Plastikente wrote:
- It does sound like we've taking a bit of a beating, all-in-all though. I guess we can only hope that a new codex will fix some stuff, like maybe making WWPs work again...
If you're talking about being able to assault out of WWPs, I wouldn't get your hopes up. Nothing else can assault from reserves and, if there was going to be an exception to that, I doubt it would be in a xeno book. | |
|
 | |
Count Adhemar Dark Lord of Granbretan

Posts : 7333 Join date : 2012-04-26 Location : London
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 22:17 | |
| To me it looks like GW has a very firm rule that nothing gets to assault without having at least one round of shooting + overwatch against it. Don't hold your breath for assault from WWP!
_________________ You have been weighed, you have been measured, and you have been found wanting. In what world could you possibly beat me? | |
|
 | |
Mushkilla Arena Champion

Posts : 4017 Join date : 2012-07-16 Location : Toroid Arena
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Sun May 25 2014, 22:27 | |
| In some ways webway portals got better this edition, we can benefit from autarch reserve manipulation and we can keep more than 50% of our army in reserve. | |
|
 | |
Deathofclubs Slave

Posts : 18 Join date : 2014-05-07
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 00:47 | |
| With sliscus we can keep almost all our army in reserve and deepstrike on 2+ with the right strategic trait _________________ "A fall from that height would kill anyone — before they struck the ground!"
| |
|
 | |
Bibitybopitybacon Wych

Posts : 592 Join date : 2012-07-01
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 02:08 | |
| Since we can get in battle brother transports I wonder if battle brother allies will be allowed through the portal come the FAQ? I'd love to send an avatar out of a portal along with the rest of my pointy eared Mongol horde! | |
|
 | |
Martinman Hellion

Posts : 42 Join date : 2014-01-17
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 03:52 | |
| - @The Shredder wrote:
Nothing else can assault from reserves and, if there was going to be an exception to that, I doubt it would be in a xeno book. Blood Angels Vanguard Veterans with Jump Packs can still assault after Deep Strike. The FAQ never changed the special rule. | |
|
 | |
jbwms713 Kabalite Warrior

Posts : 119 Join date : 2013-07-13
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 04:27 | |
| For the love of all things dark and gruesome, will you all stop complaining about a flamer hit? It has an 8" range!! Why did you come within 8" of something that can kill you without killing it first??? Are you not Dark Eldar?
MY OTHER ARMY IS TYRANIDS. Want to talk about the shaft? Let's play that game.
Psy Phase moving to less powers cast per turn only helps us. If we ally in a 'Seer, he'll still be casting his powers (and get a bonus if you stick to one tree). Speaking of, you can toss him in with a unit, finally, and cast something prior to charging. Want re-rolls with your Archon? Cool, take a 'Seer with Prescience. Done. Divination is still powerful, if more balanced by WC2 powers.
Snap shots after Jink? So now our bikes get a 3+ even without flat out? Cool. Oh, we have to snap fire? Cute, I was going to blade vane anyway.
I hear Supersonic no longer disallows Hover Mode. If this is true, this is HUGE for us. Supersonic was a terrible rule to have. Now it's (if as I said) only a plus. This will mean I can take a full HS of flyers seriously, instead of in games where I just want to be able to shout "Eldar Air Superiority!!!" every turn.
Defensive grenades. I took PGL's on Wyches for the stealth bonus. Now we can blind instead? Meh, probably won't pay the points for it, but whatevs. Assault is still pretty bunk, it's haywire wyches or bust.
It's still a shooting game, and we're still really good at that. Plus, we're due for an update in a handful of months. I'd love to see Mandrakes become decent, because I just think they're fun. Or assault grenades on Incubi, then I'd laugh so hard it comes out my ears.
I don't think much will change about the way I build/play DE, except that I'll be happier with the Flyer I typically take. | |
|
 | |
Expletive Deleted Wych

Posts : 581 Join date : 2013-07-31
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 05:05 | |
| - @jbwms713 wrote:
- For the love of all things dark and gruesome, will you all stop complaining about a flamer hit? It has an 8" range!! Why did you come within 8" of something that can kill you without killing it first??? Are you not Dark Eldar?
I wasn't aware Dark Eldar had the ability to intercept deep striking units. Which unit was that again? My memory is kind of hazy. - @jbwms713 wrote:
- I hear Supersonic no longer disallows Hover Mode. If this is true, this is HUGE for us. Supersonic was a terrible rule to have. Now it's (if as I said) only a plus.
I hadn't heard about this, and my local gamestore didn't get any rulebooks in. At all. So I haven't had a chance to look at it, but I'll be damned, I'd really like this. _________________ "Excess, yeah that's what we do best."
| |
|
 | |
Dethric Hellion

Posts : 36 Join date : 2014-05-01
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 07:13 | |
| - @Expletive Deleted wrote:
- @jbwms713 wrote:
- For the love of all things dark and gruesome, will you all stop complaining about a flamer hit? It has an 8" range!! Why did you come within 8" of something that can kill you without killing it first??? Are you not Dark Eldar?
I wasn't aware Dark Eldar had the ability to intercept deep striking units. Which unit was that again? My memory is kind of hazy.
- @jbwms713 wrote:
- I hear Supersonic no longer disallows Hover Mode. If this is true, this is HUGE for us. Supersonic was a terrible rule to have. Now it's (if as I said) only a plus.
I hadn't heard about this, and my local gamestore didn't get any rulebooks in. At all. So I haven't had a chance to look at it, but I'll be damned, I'd really like this. Firstly, i do not think that the template thing will be huge. Sure it is a nerf, but it does not feel as the end of the world. Secondly: Wording on super sonic has changed, the last part where it disallows hover has been removed. Has anyone seen anything on characters and precision shots? It seems like it has been removed. Also i wonder about our flyers. There are no longer any stats or anything for units in the rulebook, and the FAQ says that we should ignore their unit type in the book and refer to the rulebook  | |
|
 | |
Drk_Oblitr8r Hellion

Posts : 51 Join date : 2012-07-19 Location : Earth
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 07:30 | |
| - @jbwms713 wrote:
- For the love of all things dark and gruesome, will you all stop complaining about a flamer hit? It has an 8" range!! Why did you come within 8" of something that can kill you without killing it first??? Are you not Dark Eldar?
Torrent flamers have 12" plus the template. Played a game against a Khorne/Tzeentch Daemon army, and the two flamer chariots had killed 5/7 Wyches with FNP before they could get out of their Raider, but the Wyches were taking their time getting to where I wanted them. So it's not super bad, just fairly unpleasant. | |
|
 | |
Dragontree Wych

Posts : 521 Join date : 2013-11-15 Location : Bristol
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 10:22 | |
| - @Dethric wrote:
Has anyone seen anything on characters and precision shots? It seems like it has been removed.
Its a USR now (page 169) clarifying it as a special rule in its own right and if someone has the precision shot special rule without any clarifying dice roll (such as it occurs on a 5+ or on all shots) then it just occurs on a 6. That helps with all the Astra militarum orders argument.. | |
|
 | |
Dethric Hellion

Posts : 36 Join date : 2014-05-01
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 10:58 | |
| - @Dragontree wrote:
- @Dethric wrote:
Has anyone seen anything on characters and precision shots? It seems like it has been removed.
Its a USR now (page 169) clarifying it as a special rule in its own right and if someone has the precision shot special rule without any clarifying dice roll (such as it occurs on a 5+ or on all shots) then it just occurs on a 6.
That helps with all the Astra militarum orders argument.. Yeah I saw that, though it seems like characters has lost the "precision shot" rule ^.- | |
|
 | |
Panic_Puppet Wych

Posts : 506 Join date : 2012-12-30
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 11:17 | |
| The flamer hit on a transport doesn't bother me hugely -in general-. However, there are two things that are just utterly atrocious for us... Drop Pod Frag Cannon Furioso Dreads, and Heldrakes. Just pray your opponent rolls low on the number of hits. If you see a fragioso, cry. _________________  | |
|
 | |
Dragontree Wych

Posts : 521 Join date : 2013-11-15 Location : Bristol
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 11:18 | |
| - @Dethric wrote:
- @Dragontree wrote:
- @Dethric wrote:
Has anyone seen anything on characters and precision shots? It seems like it has been removed.
Its a USR now (page 169) clarifying it as a special rule in its own right and if someone has the precision shot special rule without any clarifying dice roll (such as it occurs on a 5+ or on all shots) then it just occurs on a 6.
That helps with all the Astra militarum orders argument.. Yeah I saw that, though it seems like characters has lost the "precision shot" rule ^.- Ah sorry I totally missed the characters point in your first post! Early morning bleary eyed reading... It does seem to be absent from the book. Maybe an FAQ to state all independent characters have it at some point. | |
|
 | |
Dethric Hellion

Posts : 36 Join date : 2014-05-01
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review Mon May 26 2014, 12:16 | |
| - @Dragontree wrote:
- @Dethric wrote:
- @Dragontree wrote:
- @Dethric wrote:
Has anyone seen anything on characters and precision shots? It seems like it has been removed.
Its a USR now (page 169) clarifying it as a special rule in its own right and if someone has the precision shot special rule without any clarifying dice roll (such as it occurs on a 5+ or on all shots) then it just occurs on a 6.
That helps with all the Astra militarum orders argument.. Yeah I saw that, though it seems like characters has lost the "precision shot" rule ^.- Ah sorry I totally missed the characters point in your first post! Early morning bleary eyed reading...
It does seem to be absent from the book. Maybe an FAQ to state all independent characters have it at some point.
Well i guess it makes the Hexrifle a bit more worth it, since we can't snipe with other weapons anymore. Also, AM has wargear that provides Precision shots for one of their commanders. Maybe GW thought precision shots was a bit to much and nerfed it? | |
|
 | |
Sponsored content
 | Subject: Re: 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review  | |
| |
|
 | |
| 7th Changes for Dark Eldar - a review | |
|