THE DARK CITY
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
HomeDark Eldar WikiDark Eldar ResourcesNull CityRegisterLog in

 

 Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi

Go down 
+13
Siticus the Ancient
CaptainBalroga
Evil Space Elves
tlronin
Winternacht
lonewolf
Ruke
Raneth
Shadows Revenge
Fatuous
Nomic
Darkgreen Pirate
Thor665
17 posters
Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Old vs. New?
Old Haems cost half as much and were better in every way - duh.
Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba1312%Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba15
 12% [ 4 ]
New Haems, they have Pain Tokens...PAIN TOKENS!
Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba1382%Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba15
 82% [ 28 ]
I play a Coven army, one way or another I was going to play Haems, they're awesome.
Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba130%Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba15
 0% [ 0 ]
How much flesh could a Haemon sculpt if a Haemon could sculpt flesh?
Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba136%Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Voteba15
 6% [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 34
 

AuthorMessage
Thor665
Archon
Thor665


Posts : 5526
Join date : 2011-06-10
Location : Venice, FL

Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi   Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 I_icon_minitimeThu Apr 26 2012, 04:30

4+ FNP is quite different from 4+ invulnerable.

_________________
Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 K93hWhs
Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 L1RsnGX
The Title Troupe! - Nom fellow posters for custom titles.
Back to top Go down
corollax
Hellion
avatar


Posts : 51
Join date : 2012-04-24

Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi   Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi - Page 2 I_icon_minitimeThu Apr 26 2012, 16:27

@Thor665 wrote:
4+ FNP is quite different from 4+ invulnerable.

Quite. I'd almost go so far as to say they're complete opposites. FNP protects units from high-volume, low-quality firepower. Lasrifles, tesla weaponry, and usually splinter or bolter weaponry falls into this category. When you're forced to flip an extra coin to see if each wound sticks, the strategy of throwing dice at the problem becomes much less effective. Multi-wound models can also fill this role.

Invulnerable (and cover) saves work in the opposite fashion. When your opponents are lobbing lascannons or plasma at you, Drazhar's 2+ armor save, 3 wounds, and FNP aren't doing you any favors. He lacks an invuln, but putting him in cover will improve his survivability dramatically.

This is part of why wyches work so well with Haemonculi. It's very difficult to kill them efficiently. If they've got FNP, that's an extra 4+ save you've got to go through. You could use AP2 or S6 weaponry to kill them, but that's not very efficient when you've still got to deal with a further 4+ invuln or cover save. The only practical way to deal with them is flamers (unless your opponent politely leaves them out of cover for you...)

You can also go about this in the opposite way. Sticking wracks in cover gives you a remarkably durable unit. I'd go so far as to call them the 2nd or 3rd best objective camper in the game, by point-value.

Interestingly, you can also accomplish this by diversified unit types. Beastmasters are a spectacular example.
Back to top Go down
 
Old vs. New - Battle of the Haemonculi
Back to top 
Page 2 of 2Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
THE DARK CITY :: 

GENERAL DRUKHARI DISCUSSION

 :: Drukhari Discussion
-
Jump to: