Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

HomeDark Eldar WikiDark Eldar ResourcesLatest imagesNull CityRegisterLog in


 Supplement post regarding recent FAQ from GW

Go down 

Posts : 254
Join date : 2017-10-23

Supplement post regarding recent FAQ from GW  Empty
PostSubject: Supplement post regarding recent FAQ from GW    Supplement post regarding recent FAQ from GW  I_icon_minitimeSat Nov 18 2017, 16:15

It isn't often these days Dark Eldar are mentioned in anything from GW, but - as expected - GW has made mention that they believe the Ynnari nurf is appropriate given the changes seen in the Craftworld Eldar codex, as well as what we can expect in the Drukhari and Harlequin codexes to come.

It is a little bit of a touchy subject surrounding the Ynnari nurf (rightfully so), but personally...this very, very small mention of why GW thought it important to 'nurf' Ynnari makes me happy and is in line with what I anticipated to be the reason for the nurf.

As a Dark Eldar purist, I'm not very interested in Ynnari, and I would hate for GW to run with the notion that "sure Dark Eldar don't have access to ______, but we have given them the Ynnari, and so they can follow the Ynnari path if they really need ______."

It lends itself to Harlequins and Dark Eldar possibly seeing complete codexes. Tyranids' codex is very much what I would like to be the closest approximation to what we see implemented. It is a very well-rounded army, complete with efficient ranged, melee, psychic (obviously not us), and versatile units.

Kabal of the Killing Moon
Back to top Go down
Supplement post regarding recent FAQ from GW
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» some recent projects
» My LGS just had a recent APOC game.
» supplement viable?
» recent 1750 list tournament
» Supplement Harlequins

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum


 :: News & Rumours
Jump to: